Det är jättebra värden! Dell skriver själva att de garanterar att det håller sig under 5 enheters avvikelse i genomsnitt, men det skriver de nog mest för att vara på den säkra sidan.
Från TFT Central, Lacies förklaring
If DeltaE >3, the color displayed is significantly different from the theoretical one, meaning that the difference will be perceptible to the viewer.
*
If DeltaE <2, LaCie considers the calibration a success; there remains a slight difference, but it is barely undetectable.
*
If DeltaE < 1, the color fidelity is excellent.
At default settings, colour accuracy was fairly good on average, with a dE of 2.3. This actually offered pretty accurate colour reproduction even at factory settings, and this was a pleasing result from the 2490WUXi. The screen is orientated at the colour enthusiast market, and so accurate colours, even without calibration, are certainly advantageous. dE maximum ranged up to 8.7 in blue shades, so you will need some form of calibration to improve on these results.
En annan skärm
Colours felt pretty even and temperature seemed quite good to the naked eye. There was no oversaturation of colours or reds and greens feeling too neon, and you can tell that this is a standard gamut screen
These observations were reflected in our readings from the LaCie Blue Eye Pro, with colour temperature being only 15% away from the target 6500k of daylight. It was recorded at 5506k which was not too bad.
Average dE here at default settings was 3.9 which is fairly average and not particularly great. Maximum dE did range up to 7.7 in some shades but overall the colour rendering was fairly even in terms of accuracy or lack there-of. Some calibration would clearly be needed to get better results from this screen, but out of the box, this was a fairly average TN Film panel performance.
Ett exempel, 10 blandade skärmar, två stycken har neremot två enheters avvikelse innan kalibrering, resten klart högre
http://www.tftcentral.co.uk/images/samsung_2233rz/delta_e_com...
