Vad är det som är så bra med BF3?

Jag tycker grafiken är hemsk, ett av de största skälen till att bf3 är mycket sämre.

Ljudet i bf3 suger hästku&. Man kan inte höra fiendes fotsteg även om dem hoppar bakom en.

Det finns fan inget bra med det, det suger. Fullt med buggar fullt med trolls och utvecklarna är bland dom mest hjärnlösa idioterna som finns.

The player drop off on this game is saying something. I hadn't played in a month until today. EA sent out a questionnaire asking people why they quit playing. Their questions didn't have the option for 1. The game wasn't what I expected 2. Lack of communication with the player community and patches to fix bugs 3. Bad netcode. Instead, they had 1. The game is too easy 2. The game is too hard 3. I want more DLC Based on the upcoming patch, I think most people selected #2. Watering the game down more. I expected so much out of this game, but it ended up being a conglomeration of BF2, BC2, COD and MOH that didn't "NAIL IT" on anything except a great running graphics engine and the greatest number of promises not delivered in any game I have ever bought. As for netcode, most modern games use a hybrid server/client hit detection model that works quite well. There are even free to play games that have better net code than BF3, which is just appalling. Previous BF games were bad because they were server side only - with clients only having the option to increase or lower interpolation. With pure client-side netcode, you get seemingly random deaths, opponents that die extremely slowly, and all kinds of other annoying frustrations. I've waited for months for those patches to come, but I've realized some of them never will. They'll never update the net code to a better model. They'll never increase the destruction to make certain maps like Bazaar and Metro more fun and less explosive spammy. They'll never add in-game voice (another thing common in many F2P games from small companies) And they'll never address another greater issue with the heart of the game - the vehicles are lackluster in implementation and integration into the balance of the game. They'll feel like an afterthought that was just thrown in haphazardly. They made an infantry fighting game out of a large-scale war game. And even that is poor because of the bad netcode. Sure, some bug fixes have come along.. They fixed the bugs that were in the beta that they said were already fixed for the game launch. Like the laggy servers, falling through the world on metro, gadgets flat out not working... But it's really just been one huge let down. I can't say I'll be buying BF4 or BC3 or anything. I've learned my lesson that PR likes to make false promises and do anything to drum up hype. They flat out lie sometimes. I just don't know what to expect when I buy a game from EA. There's no assurance of quality. They don't realize that many are already boycotting them. I wouldn't say I'm boycotting them, it's more like someone who has burned their hand on a hot stove being cautious about touching it again.

I love everything about how this game should play. Masterful multiplayer, perfect for the 4 of us friends to enjoy together, fantastic maps/weapons/vehicles, and the best graphics to date in gaming. If I could play it all day long with friends, I probably would. But I can't. Punkbuster took me out of BF3 all this week after a known security flaw was finally abused. The awful Origin web-based Steam-wannabe launching platform boots me from whatever server I'm in about once per hour. The game freezes and crashes about once per two hours, separate from Origin. The amount of deaths sustained in any 4 hour marathon play session from bugs, glitches, and most notably from hackers requires constant effort to find an enjoyable server. Nothing from EA, Dice, or punkbuster has removed the massive amount of cheating on PC play. Just look at the leaderboards Origin gives you. None are legit. This game was going to be absolutely huge upon release. Everyone knew that. EA was going to make a fortune on this game no matter what, and their preference to take extra net income over spending a few million bucks to make this game work is very obvious. Steam anti cheat has worked properly for many years, as has their delivery system and platform. EA elected not to use that system this time around, obviously to make even more money. The cash grab that is Origin is fine, if it works properly!!! It doesn't. At all. When the gaming community hands you a billion dollars of our money, we shouldn't have to deal with such issues. We should all be talking about balancing issues, new items, new maps, how to further improve such a great release, but the only thing the BF3 forum produces is complaints of stability, complaints about hacking, complaints about bugs, etc. We are far beyond the initial release kinks that every massive selling game will endure. EA's traditional business model of spamming out a game with a higher number behind the title to make more money on the franchise continues, and I won't be suckered into buying another unless I read how stable and flawless the game is 3-6 months after release.

Hur kan folk vara så jävla efterblivna att de argumenterar för en sak utan att ha koll på det andra. Tråden handlar om bf3 vs bf2 men folk som har snöat in på bf3 kan omöjligt ha något att jämföra med. Ni som höjer bf3 till skyarna har liten erfarenhet av mp-fps, annars hade ni inte tyckt som ni gör.

spelar du verkligen samma spel som jag???? nämn gärna ett bättre fps...

Som jag skrattade när jag läste ditt inlägg!

Alla är vi nybörjare i början, men även nybörjare ställer krav! Glöm inte det.

Om grafiken är det sämsta du sett, så undrar jag vilken hårdvara du kör med? Och buggarna.... Ja världen går under, det finns en bugg! Låt den vara och anpassa dig, den kommer att försvinna, kanske inte idag, men, den försvinner med tiden, och det är lika för alla

Och jagar du samarbete så skaffa lite BF3 vänner och snacka över Teamspeak/Mumble! Så ska du se att du får en helt annan syn på det!! !!

EA-fail ? (finns ju även en annan lösning om man tycker så och inte har kul, spela ett annat spel, varför spela BF3 om man känner så som du gör)

Jag kan inte jämföra bf2 med bf3 då jag aldrig spelat bf2.

Bf3 är kul. Det har snygg grafik och ganska bra gameplay.

Tyvärr tappar man suget pga allt klydd med det.
Är det inte Origin som är knäppt så är det spelet i sig själv som krashar/hänger sig/bluescreenar/etc.
Extra störigt blir det när man tappar allt man "tjänat ihop" under matchens gång (det är ett stort j*vla minus till bf3).
Lagom kul att spela 64p Caspain Border 1000 tickets bara för att se bf3 krasha när man är 50 tickets ifrån vinst.
Sen så har EA inte direkt världens bästa service, och det finns gott om fuskare som gör att man tappar suget ännu mer.

Har själv inte spelat bf3 på 2 veckor, och saknar det inte ett dugg, och det gör inte mina grafikkort heller. (det enda spelet som de går upp i ~75*c i). Det är kul när det väl funkar...vilket det tyvärr gör alldeles för sällan. Det ska inte vara ett lotteri att spela ett spel...

Dessutom är grafiken inte -så- snygg som folk verkar tycka. Javisst, den -är- snygg, men i förhållande till hur dyra grafikkort man behöver för att köra det i ultra (eftersom vi pratar grafik nu), så är det skrattretande hur mycket pengar man behöver investera i det.